EMA Journal - Fall 2025

In the Know

Chris Semrau 2025-11-25 07:47:29

Pay-at-Pump vs. Pay-Inside

The American fuel retail landscape is dominated by convenience, with gasoline consumption nearly three times higher than diesel and with gas station retail sales exceeding $51 billion in April 2025.1 As consumer payment preferences continue to evolve, understanding the choice between pay-at-pump and pay-inside transactions has become crucial for station operators seeking to maximize both customer satisfaction and profitability.

The Clear Consumer Preference

Recent industry data reveals a decisive trend: 83 percent of consumers reported a preference to pay at the pump, while only 8 percent prefer to complete the purchase inside the store.2 This overwhelming preference for outdoor payment reflects consumers’ desire for speed and convenience, particularly as pay-at-pump technology became widely adopted to reduce staffing costs and streamline the fueling process.

The benefits of pay-at-pump are straightforward: unmatched convenience, reduced wait times and the ability to fuel up 24/7 without requiring staff interaction. For station operators, this translates to lower staffing costs and the ability to serve more customers during peak hours.

The Revenue Impact of Payment Choice

However, the preference for pay-at-pump presents a significant challenge for station profitability — as the goods inside these stores only account for ~30 percent of the average gas station’s revenue, yet bring in 70 percent of the profit.3

For station operators, the challenge lies in balancing customer convenience with revenue optimization. Pay-inside transactions remain essential for cash customers and provide opportunities for impulse purchases that drive profitability. According to MMCG’s 2023 data, a typical gas station generated approximately $1,081,203 in convenience store sales, which underscores the significance of in-store transactions. This revenue was distributed across various product categories. Notably, tobacco products accounted for around $286,677, while lottery sales contributed another $135,073.

Successful operators are finding ways to encourage inside visits through competitive pricing, loyalty programs and strategic product placement, while still maintaining the convenience of pay-at-pump options that 83 percent of customers prefer.

Chris Semrau

by Chris Semrau, Enterprise Relationship Manager, Worldpay, EMA Corporate Silver Partner

© 2024 Worldpay LLC. Worldpay® and any associated brand names/logos are the trademarks of Worldpay LLC and/or its affiliates. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Sources:

1 Statista

2 What a Preference to Pay at the Pump Means for Brands (2022), CSP Daily News

3 Why Most Gas Stations Don’t Make Money from Selling Gas (2022), The Hustle

©Innovative Publishing Ink. View All Articles.

In the Know
https://mydigitalpublication.com/article/In+the+Know/5076007/857329/article.html

Menu
  • Page View
  • Responsive View
  • Advertisers
  • EMA Website
  • EMA Facebook Page
  • Advertise with Us!

Issue List

Spring 2026

Fall 2025

Summer 2025

Spring 2025

Fall 2024

Summer 2024

Spring 2024

Fall 2023

Summer 2023

Spring 2023

Fall 2022

Summer 2022

Spring 2022

Winter 2022

EMA Journal Fall 2021

EMA Journal Summer 2021

EMA Journal Spring 2021

EMA Journal Winter 2021

PMAA Journal Fall 2020

PMAA Journal Summer 2020

PMAA Journal Spring 2020

PMAA Journal Winter 2020

PMAA Journal Fall 2019

PMAA Journal Summer 2019

PMAA Journal Spring 2019

PMAA Journal Winter 2019

PMAA Journal Fall 2018

PMAA Journal Summer 2018

PMAA vol13 iss2

PMAA v13 iss1

PMAA Journal Fall 2017/Annual Membership Directory

PMAA Journal Summer 2017

PMAA Journal Spring 2017

PMAA Journal Winter 2017

PMAA DIR + MAG

PMAA v11 n3

PMAA Journal

PMAA Journal

PMAA v10 n4

Summer 2015

Spring 2015

Winter 2015

Fall 2014

Summer 2014

Spring 2014

Winter 2014

Summer 2013

Spring 2013

Winter 2013

Fall 2013


Library